Home » Featured » Darknet: Fake child pornography is supposed to attract sex offenders
Click Here To Hide Tor

Darknet: Fake child pornography is supposed to attract sex offenders

The dark web or darknet facilitates various criminal acts which perpetrators commit on a daily basis. Although many people would prefer not to accept the fact that, a lot of crimes on the darknet are awful and vile, the truth intensively stands the same. Moreover, one of the most dreadful acts criminals involve themselves in on the dark web is child pornography, which is designed to abuse and harm children. Child pornography on the dark web has been available for quite a while now. Despite the fact that these criminals have not been committing the act every now and again, like other crimes such as illicit drug deals, little attention has be given to this topic.

According to a report by the German Press Agency in Munich, the proof of crime on the Darknet has always been quite troublesome in essence, due to its state of anonymity. Therefore, investigators usually craft ways to cleverly penetrate the darknet, to be able to come out with vivid evidence in taking on cyber criminals. However, one major issue noticed by investigators is the recent use of “chastity samples” for undercover investigations.

In the view of Bavaria’s Justice Minister, Winfried Bausback’s thought to use fake child pornography on the internet in an attempt to go on a criminal hunt. It is quite shocking that the highest lawyers in the Free State motivate to ponder such strange ways of taking on criminals.

Nonetheless, the CSU politician of the German Press Agency in Munich stated that “in the area of ​​child pornography, our undercover investigators often come up against the limits under current law.” He also said that, in order for investigators not to be noticed as a secret detective in the internet exchange sites, they would first have to submit a “chastity test.” This means, by so doing, they can even upload child pornography material. However, “since the act of using child porn materials to take down criminals is not possible under the current law, the perpetrators can easily unmask secret investigators,” he added.

Frequently, the law enforcement has no further investigation tactics on the transaction in stock trades, with a specific end goal to prove and to uncover the perpetrators from “their abominable and obnoxious mischief,” emphasized Bausback. He stated that “we need to change that urgently.” The use of fake images and videos with child pornography content created specifically for purposes of secret investigations could help to keep the anonymity of the officers safe, and at the same time put the perpetrators away for the better.

In any case, the investigators would without a doubt need to act “very cautious.” Likewise they must require the new rules to at least make tight limits a bit flexible for them: “by so doing, the secret investigators will have the permit to transfer and upload fake child pornographic material,,” indicated Bausback. He further made investigators aware of the consequences of using real child pornographic material and also cautioned investigating authorities to never go by a way which might actually harm children.

Lastly, Bausback said, “in the fight against child pornography particularly on the Darknet, law enforcers have to employ the use of secret investigators of central importance.” Furthermore, because this is not at all like the fight against drugs and arms trafficking, there is no “offline component” in the child pornography. There should be classic investigative actions, for example. Nonetheless, the objective of all endeavors and efforts must be to prevent sexual abuse and also stop additional acts that harm children because “one abused child is already too many.”

7 comments

  1. Australian police already distributes child pornography on behalf of law enforcement agencies worldwide.

  2. This is no different than law enforcement sending out chalk pills once they have caught a vendor in order to potentially catch his/her customers. Hopefully this new strategy will be used to target the largest producers and distributors rather than just any idiot who happens to click a random link (as with PP)

  3. This whole article reeks of evidence of just how stupid the hunt for child pornography is…

    As they say themselves:
    “this is not at all like the fight against drugs and arms trafficking, there is no “offline component” in the child pornography”

    In other words: They are going after people who haven’t harmed anyone. Who are just sitting alone, hiding in their room, jerking off.

    Since there is no actual wrongdoing, these prudes resort to saying how “disgusting” they think the porn is. This whole thing is like a more extreme version of “Eat Da Poo-Poo”, where the LEA “pastors” are arresting people just for seeing pictures.

    Not only that, but it now turns out time and again that cops are the main distributors of CP, and now they even want to produce it themselves!

    Anyone who supports this ridiculousness should be ashamed of themselves. There are real victims to this idiocy, namely those who are arrested. Nobody should be arrested just for seeing a picture.

    • Public Service Annoucement: Watch Out for Pete O'file!

      PEDO ALERT! PEDO ALERT! PEDO ALERT! PEDO ALERT! PEDO ALERT!

      It’s amazing how these articles never fail to bring out the pedo symphatists and apologists right through to the fully-fledged NAMBLA card-carrying pedo-activist. The thing that’s even more disgusting than your depraved tastes for sexually engaging minors is the fact that you reprobates now feel comfortable enough to bang the “Oh us poor pedos are just getting picked on”.

      “There are real victims to this idiocy, namely those who are arrested.”

      See that’s the mentality of a kiddy-diddler for ya! No chance the ACTUAL VICTIMS are the children getting coerced by those closest to them into thinking what’s going on in those photos is actually normal, is it you rockspider cunt?

  4. Go fuck yourself. No picture or video of anything should be illegal to simply watch in the privacy of your own home, and I say that as a humanistic libertarian, not a “child predator” or someone having an interest in that kind of material. It’s by principle. You can sign on to any gore site and legally watch footage of so much worse things happening to kids, murders and mayhem beyond belief, than someone sucking a little dick or just some nude kid playing with himself/herself, which is really super innocent on its own. I’m sure there are genuine videos of kids being raped out there and worse, and while obviously heinous, I still don’t think it’s justifiable to prosecute someone for simply looking at a video for whatever reason, considering the extreme carnage anyone have access to, one click away. In that case, law enforcement are all child predators.

    It’s an outdated, puritan witch hunt only still conducted by a few remaining anti-sex countries on a dying crusade, spearheaded by a faltering, has-been USA still saturated by archaic, christian-fundamental sex phobia, nothing else, and people having their lives ruined without ever having harmed anyone, despite what you freaks accuse them of in the most absurd of anti-rationalizations, are indeed victims. If you detest their attractions so much, you should offer them help and support, not dehumanize and shame them, only violent rapists need to be separated from society, not your average harmless Herbert the pervert, come on now, nobody really feared these people until the 1990’s, when the newspapers started drumming up mass hysteria to boost revenue, spewing out a bunch of bizarre fairy tales about enormous child rape rings in the highest of circles, and so forth. It was a way to make a quick buck, based on pure fiction. Sensationalist nonsense.

    People genuinely abusing kids should face consequences, but many a convict never did so. Also, I strongly advocate that sex isn’t automatically abuse, just because someone is so old and so old. It can be a very loving, gentle and enjoyable experience across age gaps, if people take care of each other and respect boundaries. Children can be very willing participants, I should know: I had consensual sex at 10 with an adult and loved it, played doctor with other kids now and then from about age 5 and enjoyed that too. Not even close to abuse – only a deranged, militant American or British sex-hater would even suggest such. Today I’m happily married and fairly “normal”, but normalcy should not be so idealized in general. People are different and should allowed to be, as long as they treat others nicely and respect their free will.

    It’s very much okay to be abnormal and different, as long as it’s right for you and feels okay. The face of normalcy is a constantly transforming concept, regardless. In many places, it’s not that uncommon for kids to be sexually active, with each other and also adults, and most less “developed” countries fitting that description have much lower suicide rates and amounts of depressed people, than the “modern” nations so aggressively combating all kinds of child sexuality these days, even the consensual, positive aspects of it.

    Humanity needs to be set free and people need to be a lot more compassionate and understanding in general, a lot kinder to each other. Even talking about people who sadly violently rape others, I’m willing to consider that many of them would have not become so ruthless, had they not been met by such stigmatization to begin with. Some can’t help themselves and need to be kept in confinement, I acknowledge that, but you really can communicate with most people and yield results with an understanding, loving and non-judgemental approach.

    You’re funny, so hysterical and out of balance. So mentally disturbed. Why so emotionally tilted by the idea of children being sexual beings, while probably simultaneously of all the thousands of CHILD MURDERS facilitated by Uncle Sam, throughout the years and currently? Chill out, go cuddle a kitten and smoke a joint or whatever. Very happy frigidity mongers like you weren’t around when I enjoyed those moments with my lover at age 10, good times people like you weren’t able to ruin.

  5. Gary, you spokesperson for NAMBLA ?

  6. Wow , copy and paste that shit .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Captcha: *